Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. But va panel has its own problems. If you are into HDR content, HDR 400 is fake, HDR 600 is entry, HDR 1000 and up is the true hdr. If you are a bit familiar with HI-FI and headphones, let me try this parabola: the Sony is intended for the mass market. Fully and completely lost. Usually I watch movies and anime (mostly the latter, so keep "lots of different somewhat still bright and dark colors" in mind), I see a lot of pictures and I'm really all about tuning monitors for the most "original" and "genuine" image. It will not solve all your doubts, but l hope it can help: I have in front of me 2 very different products: A Sony 4k TV (Sony Bravia KD43XE7093BU, basically a X720e if you are in the US. Va color accuracy not bad. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, BENQ XL2720Z - ACER XZ271 - SAMSUNG C27HG70 - LG 27GL850. IPS = better colors, which means better picture. Home of the computer component that you see most, your Monitor. Only because l have the Benq side by side l know how much detail is lost on the Sony TV. In-plane switching involves arranging and switching the orientation of the molecules of the liquid crystal (LC) layer between the glass substrates. So i can say that chg70 can produce accurate colors(not %100). If you view full screen red color edges may appear pink while center pure red. Given you are sitting properly in front of the monitor, the better color accuracy from viewing angles for IPS is a moot point. IPS panels are arguably the best in class in terms of viewing angle behavior, color reproduction, faster response times, exceptional color accuracy, and screen consistency. Also viewing angles aren't really an issue for me, since i just sit in front of the the middle of the screen anyway. Good contrast means screen looks like painted paper. No filters, no tricks. If they don't have the VESA HDR certification/dolby vision/ hdr+ etc, you probably shouldn't use HDR even if it includes it. Color consistency not good. Its quantum dot va panel. ... IPS shows the accurate color between input and output color signal) For IPS, Actual color and the color on the screen are the same. Flat screen LCD monitors use TN, VA, or IPS panel technologies. It's also why IPS panels are favoured by artists and creative professionals: they can deliver colour accuracy that's pivotal to their workloads. Given you are sitting properly in front of the monitor, the better color accuracy from viewing angles for IPS is a moot point. The Benefits: Advantages of IPS LCD Panels 1. (think of the TV display demos you see in stores) or you want accurate color that represent the original content creator's work? So, I play games, and don't really fancy FPS. VA panels tend to do better than TN panels– significantly so as prices increase. First off, TN will always have poor viewing angles because that is the limitation of the design itself. They’re the only variety that regularly provides 95% or even 100% of DCI-P3, the widest color gamut currently formalized and the one used in digital cinema. What I want the monitor for: colors. That means that they are well above TN , although the colors are not as detailed as in IPS . These displays almost guarantee absolute color accuracy. HDR is a non issue. Then a few years later AUO came out with their 1440p/144hz AHVA displays (also marketed as IPS) and they have lower QC standards than LG or Samsung. One way that VA panels defeat even IPS panels can be found in their deep blacks. 8 bit +frc 10bit or true 10bit color monitors are even better/if you care enough for them(but you will be hard pressed to find some with 240hz refresh rate one but there are plenty with 144hz-165hz). response time, refresh, etc. But TN monitors has no ips glow. In the end, I'm at my wit's end. I wish people would stop comparing panels just based on the technology they use. IPS = better colors, which means more accurate picture. Display technology: Your 4K monitor’s display should be IPS, not TN (or VA), because IPS panels provide far better viewing angles and color reproduction. l believe l completely understand your confusion as l am myself wondering the same: "IPS has better color accuracy," yet it reproduces blacks that are 'semi-gray'? This produces much more natural color renderings than the 6-bit versions from TN monitors, which only show up to 64 shades per primary color. Mostly all the desktop space is for looking at building plans and documents. Va monitors has fake boosted blacks. Backlight Bleed wasn't even a thing yet, and a single stuck or dead pixel would warrant a return without any pushback from the company selling the product. It is a half breed between IPS and TN. IPS monitors cannot completely turn off their backlights, so even the darkest black on an IPS monitor will have noticeable backlight bleed. In 2008 you could buy a 1080p VA or IPS monitor and it would would be great. ... Don't get VA panel for color accuracy, nor the contrast. Normally IPS monitors allow up to 178 degrees of viewing angles. Now, did l just compare apples with pears? TN Panels. VA is not appropriate for gaming, good for HT viewing because of contrast cheap IPS monitors generally have better color than cheap VA monitors, good compromise for fidelity/gaming on the cheap side. That's for you to decide, l just wanted to hopefully help. Sorry.). The dynamic range (due to higher contrast) feels like black-gray1-gray2-grayN-white. When it comes to color accuracy, IPS monitors surpass the performance of TN and VA monitors with ease. Based on what you said, I believe I should be looking for a VA, real 10 bit colour, then. Benq, VA: colors aren't as vivid (because they are more truthful or real), therefore they do not 'pop up.' Another important characteristic of IPS monitors is that they are able to support professional color space technologies, such as Adobe RGB. TN-IPS-VA all of them suck i think. My CHG70 has %137 sRGB %97 DCI P3 gamut volume. IPS has superior image quality, if you exclude contrast ratio. (Even though l did separate the paragraphs to improve its readability, once submitted the website merges them all together creating a bit of a mess. shadows, dark content) is lost. And again, and again, and again. VA panels are kind of a tradeoff between the conventional TN panels and the newer IPS panels. Its contrast ratio ranges from 700:1 to 1,000:1, so blacks won’t be as deep as that of VA panels, but the IPS technology has other advantages. It seems as if in the Sony the dynamic range of the display is just 'semi-gray'/bluish/blackish or white. In fact, don't get VA panel at all. Now, let’s break down what these terms mean, and why the performance of each panel type can vary greatly. They are still Grade B panels for one reason or another though. They offer accurate colors and wide viewing angles, almost comparable to IPS panels. No matter from which angle you look at the screen, it will always be color accurate and there is little to no blue shift. Compared to TN and VA, IPS panels are brighter as well. Is it the higher contrast, the 10bit panel, or both? VA Panels offer a balanced image quality between IPS and TN. IPS displays are designed to have higher transmittance frequencies than their TFT counterparts within a shorter period of time (precisely 1 millisecond vs. 25 milliseconds). Ultimately, for the vast majority of users, the disadvantages of CRTs arent worth their limited gains, especially when TN panels meant for gaming more than adequately satisfy the needs of even competitive gamers. QC standards were lowered. The Sony TV has a 43", 8bit, '4k' (3860x2160), IPS panel. The limitations included low production of quality color and dependence of strong viewing angle. When talking about color quality itself, IPS panels do have an upper hand compared to VA and TN panels. My CHG70 has %137 sRGB %97 DCI P3 gamut volume. For this l personally need someone that could 'intellectually' explain and reconciled 'color accuracy with bad black reproduction.' TN is short for twisted nematic, referring to the LCD substrate that’s used in this type of … Only used when accurate color is needed on the high end (idk about TV's) TN for gaming for response times. Contrast. Blueshift is a slight change in the color which happens when you look at a display off axis. Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. Bad contrast means screen looks like light source. People that prefer IPS tend to find VA color … Based on an IPS panel with ~99 sRGB color gamut, the LG 27GL83A delivers accurate, consistent, and vivid colors. If you can sacrifice contrast, an IPS panel will provide fairly low latency, decent blacks, and satisfactory color coverage. It has better color accuracy and viewing angles than TN, but it's not as good in either of those things as an IPS panel. Pixio, CrossOver, and Monoprice are some brands that sell those lower Grade panels. (Even in a well illuminated room, you can easily see the difference between the black color being shown on an IPS next to a VA panel.). It's sad. People that tend to like VA find IPS Glow to be annoying and/or unacceptable. Just pure colors. Their response time is a little slower than that of TN panels, but also a little faster than IPS panels. I want pink to be pink, I want white to be white, black to be black. Additionally, many Ultrasharps now have marketing gimmicks like "Dell HDR" (fake HDR). Heck, I don't even notice any IPS bleed or glow, so I can't even correlate with people. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Now, the question is: what makes the Benq superior when it comes to truthful image reproduction? Response times weak for games. Looking to replace my Samsung CF390 with some form of 1440p 27" with freesync/gsync and higher than 75hz refresh (since I'm using 60hz now with no sync) but exhaustive research keep running up to different points: - IPS has better colour reproduction, so better image quality- VA has better contrast, so better image quality.